Marco’s Pizza opened more than 60 new stores in 2025 and is targeting 80-plus more in 2026, crossing 1,200 locations under a strategy its own chief development officer calls “a commitment to thoughtful expansion.” In the same stretch, MOD Pizza closed 70 restaurants in 2024, then another 28 in 2025, watched systemwide sales drop more than 13% to $583 million, and defaulted on its loan agreement. Same industry, same two years, opposite outcomes. The difference didn’t show up in the ribbon-cutting. It showed up in the boring numbers each company was — or wasn’t — tracking before the next lease got signed.
Your first store’s numbers include a subsidy you don’t see
A single-unit owner who works the line, closes some nights, and skips a paycheck when cash is tight is running a real business — but the P&L doesn’t show that labor as a cost. It shows a healthier margin than the business actually produces once someone else has to be paid to do those hours at store two. One multi-unit accounting analysis illustrates the same blindness at scale: a blended portfolio average can conceal a wide unit-level split — a 62% prime cost average can hide one store running 56% and another running 69%, with leadership unable to see which is which until someone builds unit-level reporting. Before you open a second location, you need store one’s true, fully-loaded number — including what it would cost to replace every hour you personally donate to it.
Prime cost has to be stable, not just good
Baker Tilly puts healthy restaurant prime cost — food and labor combined — at 58–62% of sales, noting that anything past 65% makes profitability very difficult. Hitting that range once, during a good month, isn’t the bar. The bar is holding it there through a slow month, a staffing hole, and a supplier price jump — because store two won’t get the benefit of your undivided attention the way store one has for years. Restaurant365’s expansion checklist puts it plainly: leaders capable of running day-to-day operations without you, and systems that already work under normal volume, are go/no-go conditions — not nice-to-haves you’ll figure out after signing.
The financing math a lender already does — do it first
Restaurant lending carries real, documented risk: SBA-backed loans charge off at 5.9% for full-service restaurants and 6.6% for limited-service, well above most other small-business categories. A lender prices that risk into your rate and your personal guarantee whether or not you’ve done the same math yourself. Restaurant365 recommends banking 3–6 months of operating expenses before launching an expansion — not as a cushion for the new store, but because store one still has to survive a rough patch while store two is bleeding cash during buildout and ramp-up, the two things most likely to happen at the same time.
Store one’s profit and loss statement has a line item nobody writes down: your own unpaid labor. Store two doesn’t get that subsidy.
What “disciplined” actually looked like
Marco’s framing of its own growth as “thoughtful” is marketing language, but the operational pattern underneath it is instructive: expansion paired with supply chain and franchisee-support investment rather than store count alone, and a franchise disclosure reporting a $1.3M average unit volume for its top-quartile stores, with 40% of that group meeting or beating the average — Marco’s own framing, but disclosure-document numbers a prospective franchisee can hold them to. MOD’s decline, by contrast, was read by trade press as a structural demand problem in fast-casual lunch traffic compounding an already-stretched footprint — growth that had outrun the format’s actual staying power. Neither company’s story is really about ambition. It’s about whether the numbers underneath the ambition were sound before more units got added on top of them.
The Weekly
Get the weekly operator brief.
The sharpest pizza-industry intelligence of the week — what changed, why it matters, and what operators should do with it.
Free. One email a week. Unsubscribe anytime — no hard feelings.
The honest limitation: this is a financial-readiness checklist, not a real estate or demand study — it can’t tell you whether your second trade area can actually support a shop, only whether your first one is strong enough to survive trying. And the industry’s doom narrative deserves its own scrutiny here: the commonly repeated “90% of restaurants fail in year one” figure has been directly debunked by Ohio State research using health department data, which puts real first-year failure closer to 26% and three-year failure at 59%. Opening a second location is genuinely hard. It is not, on the evidence, doomed.
